Research Paper on Technology in the Classroom
Interest: Use of technology for dyslexic students
The reason I chose this topic is because I plan to work with students with special needs when I graduate. I have a special interest in dyslexia right now because my twelve year old brother just got diagnosed with dyslexia about a month ago. Dyslexia is a disability that doesn’t go away with time; consequently the child has to learn to live with it until he or she is an adult. That’s why it’s important to find technological tools that will help the student with reading and writing. These tools might also serve the student in university, the workplace, and all through adulthood.
Synopsis 1
James, A., Electronic Gadgets to Help with Dyslexia, Dyslexic.com, published: May 3rd 2007, website: http://www.dyslexic.com/articlecontent.asp?CAT=Technology&slug=155
This article describes different portable electronic devices that can help students with dyslexia.
1. First, electronic spell checkers and dictionaries: this tool is great for students when they’re not able to be around a computer; for example: at their desk in the classroom. The student just writes the word the way he or she thinks it’s written, and the program corrects it. It’s very sensitive that it will detect very “strange” spellings. This gadget comes in different sizes and from different dictionaries. Some even come with a thesaurus so students can make sure their using the right word at the right place. The Franklin DMQ-1870 Speaking Dictionary; a more advanced device reads the spelling and definition out loud.
Second, portable scanning pens: this tool scans a word or sentence off a book or paper and reads it out loud. It’s especially good because it lets the students hear the proper phonic pattern. According to the author, research shows that this will help and accelerate learning because it will take these students less time than if they would have to look several words up in the dictionary, or decode a word one on one with a teacher. Its more advanced features are word translation and the possibility to create word banks related to a field such as medicine, geography, and science (especially good for the job market).
Third, portable word processors: this tool can be considered as a mini-computer. It is great for classrooms because it’s smaller than a regular computer and more resistant than a laptop. It has spell check and a thesaurus. This tool is great for struggling writers because it may come with a typing tutor and a phonetic word predictor.
Fourth, voice recorders: This device is great because it can record meetings, lectures or conferences. I think that many of us have a hard time following what a teacher or professor is saying and take notes at the same time. So I can just imagine how hard it is for a struggling writer. This is a newer version of the cassette tape recorder; it tapes more than 20 hours and the information can be transferred onto a computer.
Fifth, E-book: This is an electronic based text device. It enables the student to control the font and the background color to personal taste. Also, there is an option of listening to the text ou loud.
2. I think that the resource provided me with great technological gadgets that I would have otherwise not known about. It took into consideration that children with dyslexia don’t grow out of this disability, and therefore they need special tools to help them function throughout their lives; in high school, college, university, and on the job market.
3. I would definitely consider using these tools in my classroom because it would make the child with dyslexia feel more capable of doing to assigned work, whether it being reading or writing. The voice recorder might not be useful for an elementary student but all the other tools are great; I especially think that the spell checker and scanning pens would be the most useful in an elementary setting. The child’s self-esteem will be boosted because he or she won’t get as many spelling mistakes when writing a text. I hope to have the funding for these tools in the school that I work in, or I might need to ask the children’s’ parents to provide them with it.
Synopsis 2
Butteriss, S., Interview with a Dyslexic Entrepreneur – a Life Turned Around Through Technology, May 3rd 2007. http://www.dyslexic.com/articlecontent.asp?CAT=General&slug=273
1. This article talks about an interview that Sharon Butteriss had with a Dyslexic Entrepreneur: John Tipping. Before technology, he felt that he wasn’t able to “fully” do his job. He felt that his writing skills were holding him back; he couldn’t write his own quotes or invoices for his company. He asked his son or partner to do this type of work for him.
Until he was 37, he felt that there was no help available for people with dyslexia. Today, thanks to technology he can be independent and organize and write on his own; he doesn’t need to depend on his partner and son to write his emails and invoices anymore. He uses PDA to organize himself. Also, he uses a program called Read & Write to help him read his emails: it actually reads it to him. He uses a program called Dragon Naturally Speaking to write back. He sais that at 38, he had tears running down his face, when he wrote his first email on his own.
2. This interview is an inspiration to all dyslexic individuals. It shows that thanks to technology dyslexia shouldn’t stop anyone from pursuing their dreams and everyday tasks. It showed me that everyday tasks such as reading and writing emails can be difficult and depressing for individuals with dyslexia. Therefore, they need these technological tools to help them have the confidence that they can be like and, do everything like everyone else.
3. Read & Write as well as Dragon Naturally Speaking, are both great tools to use in the classroom. However, I feel that students shouldn’t fully depend on it and they should still put an effort and try reading and writing. I think that the teacher’s place is to evaluate which student really needs this tool because if used properly, it can really aid and help children boost their self esteem just like it did to the entrepreneur. Students with dyslexia sometimes have a hard time putting their ideas down on paper, and therefore, they don’t get credit for their amazing and interesting ideas. These programs allow teachers and other individuals to recognize these people’s creative ideas.
Synopsis 3
Informal discussion with Carolyn *****; psychologist
1. Carolyn is my brother’s psychologist. She has three children of her own that have different learning disabilities. Her older daughter is dyslexic; she struggled with school but thanks to technology, she is now doing her masters degree. She got her books scanned in college and university and the program read her texts to her. This program eliminated most of her frustration in regards to reading and comprehension. Before, when she read on her own, her brain wasn’t able to properly process the information because she was too concentrated on decoding words; this isn’t the case anymore because the technology reads to her. This way she can fully concentrate on the content of the book, and study on her own like any other university student.
2. Her story gave me and my parents hope for my younger brother. It made us realize that thanks to technology, nothing is impossible today. Students with disabilities can go through school and even get a bachelors or masters degree like everyone else. Individuals with dyslexia should believe in themselves because they can go very far in life.
3. I can use such a program in my classroom for children whom reading in an everyday struggle. I would use it when students are being evaluated on reading comprehension as opposed to reading alone. This way I can evaluate their comprehension; something that I would probably have a hard time doing if they were reading on their own. The student would probably be struggling to read, and therefore have a hard time understanding the content. This is my brother’s problem; when we read to him, he understands much better than when he reads on his own. However, when I want to evaluate the level of reading, I would obviously take the child alone and make him read to me.
Synopsis 4
Software: Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred version 9 http://www.dyslexic.com/dragon
1. This is a speech recognition software. It allows people with dyslexia and different disabilities to speak to their computer in order to write, and control their computer. Examples of the kind of writing that can be done is for emails, word processing, internet browsing, ECT…Individuals with disabilities usually find it very time consuming to get their thoughts out on paper or onto the computer. This tool minimizes the frustration that these individuals might encounter; it is 3 times faster than typing. It has automatic punctuation, and the users can edit their work with their voice. If the person isn’t close to a computer and wants his or her ideas to be put onto the computer, he or she can dictate their voice onto a voice recorder and then download it onto the computer. No tool is easy to work with when you aren’t familiar with it; this software comes with a tutorial to help the individual work with the system.
2. I knew that there were tools for individuals with dyslexia, but I never knew that someone can speak to a computer and get their ideas written in text. This resource has great advantages; it allows teachers to see each child’s potential and creative thinking; something teachers wouldn’t otherwise be able to do. Also, it allows students with disabilities to feel that they can write great things like any other child in the classroom. Thanks to this program, children with disabilities won’t feel secluded and different from the rest of the students.
3. I can use this software in many circumstances in my classroom. I can not only use it for dyslexic individuals but for students who might not be able to write on a computer or on paper due to an accident. They can get their ideas onto the computer even if their hand might be broken or swollen. This tool minimizes overall frustration for the students that are unable to write due to any given circumstance.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
April 9th
textbook 241-245
I had to leave early last class so I didn’t get to watch too many of the videos. However, from the couple that I watched, I realized how very different and varied they were even if we all had the same assignment! Ghada and I decided to do it as a commercial/collage on the moments of truth during ones life; our inspiration was my pregnancy. The other team’s inspiration was completely different; they were inspired from a book on rice, and that’s why they decided to film themselves making rice. The other group wanted to make it useful for teaching, so they decided to film themselves teaching a science lesson. Using movie maker isn’t very hard; however like with any other technology, it sometimes just doesn’t want to work! So we had to be patient and find tricks to make it work. One of the glitches was adding a title to a slide; if we made a small mistake, it would mix up the whole video and we would almost have to start all over. However, the most challenging part was to grab the video from utube and transforming it into a file instead of a website. We had to download a program off the internet and we got some help from Ghada’s cousin on this part.
Without any doubt, this class broadened my horizons about technology and its different uses in the classroom. As I stated in my first blog, I was very scared of using any type of technology because I felt like I just knew the basics so how would I teach children to use it. However, at the end of this class, I realize that I have gained confidence and I now know that I can use technology and help is out there if I need it. As the textbook states, it has given us example of how to use technology in to engage in meaningful learning; however it did not show us how to use the software (p.241). This was the course’s job! We were able to play around with the technology in the classroom and learn how to use it in our classroom. I never knew that creating a website can be so simple! I actually did my whole website on my own; I first thought that I would ask help from everyone and this was definitely not the case. So I am definitely proud of myself and I can say that I will use much more technology in my classroom than I initially thought that I would. As mentioned by Jonassen et al., we need to believe in our students and give them responsibility and ownership in the knowledge building. They can definitely do that with the help of technology. Also, they mention that with technology comes risk; these activities involve risk and I need to take these risks because they are worth it because the outcome might be great (p.243)! Technology is very prevalent in our society and as Jonassen mentions, teachers need to get away from the “standard and regular” ways of teaching, and use technology to enhance their teaching (p.245). I can honestly say that I am willing to start my teaching career with the “new” way of teaching and almost forget about the standard blackboard teaching.
textbook 241-245
I had to leave early last class so I didn’t get to watch too many of the videos. However, from the couple that I watched, I realized how very different and varied they were even if we all had the same assignment! Ghada and I decided to do it as a commercial/collage on the moments of truth during ones life; our inspiration was my pregnancy. The other team’s inspiration was completely different; they were inspired from a book on rice, and that’s why they decided to film themselves making rice. The other group wanted to make it useful for teaching, so they decided to film themselves teaching a science lesson. Using movie maker isn’t very hard; however like with any other technology, it sometimes just doesn’t want to work! So we had to be patient and find tricks to make it work. One of the glitches was adding a title to a slide; if we made a small mistake, it would mix up the whole video and we would almost have to start all over. However, the most challenging part was to grab the video from utube and transforming it into a file instead of a website. We had to download a program off the internet and we got some help from Ghada’s cousin on this part.
Without any doubt, this class broadened my horizons about technology and its different uses in the classroom. As I stated in my first blog, I was very scared of using any type of technology because I felt like I just knew the basics so how would I teach children to use it. However, at the end of this class, I realize that I have gained confidence and I now know that I can use technology and help is out there if I need it. As the textbook states, it has given us example of how to use technology in to engage in meaningful learning; however it did not show us how to use the software (p.241). This was the course’s job! We were able to play around with the technology in the classroom and learn how to use it in our classroom. I never knew that creating a website can be so simple! I actually did my whole website on my own; I first thought that I would ask help from everyone and this was definitely not the case. So I am definitely proud of myself and I can say that I will use much more technology in my classroom than I initially thought that I would. As mentioned by Jonassen et al., we need to believe in our students and give them responsibility and ownership in the knowledge building. They can definitely do that with the help of technology. Also, they mention that with technology comes risk; these activities involve risk and I need to take these risks because they are worth it because the outcome might be great (p.243)! Technology is very prevalent in our society and as Jonassen mentions, teachers need to get away from the “standard and regular” ways of teaching, and use technology to enhance their teaching (p.245). I can honestly say that I am willing to start my teaching career with the “new” way of teaching and almost forget about the standard blackboard teaching.
April 2nd
Assessing Meaningful Learning with Technology
Textbook Questions
1- Is assessment really a separate activity from learning? What circumstances may impact whether it is or isn’t?
Assessment isn’t separate from learning because authentic type of assessment provides information required to improve performance. Students’ skills are assessed with activities that allows them perform those tasks; they are learning while being assessed. Contrarily to older types of assessment where students are assessed on answers they provide; authentic assessment would ask science students to construct something rather than answering questions. The assessment will be on the final product of this construction, instead of being on something separate than what they are working on.
2- How do you see assessment activities as a way to generate feedback that can improve learner performance? After reading this chapter, are there ways you can see how technology can contribute to this?
Because authentic assessment is based on activities that students need to perform in the future, feedback will be necessary. The students will be assessed on the product of this given activity; the feedback given will improve the students’ learning performance on future tasks. The example given in the textbook about social studies students polling the public is a perfect example; they will need to poll people in their future; by being assessed on this task, their learning performance will improve and they will know what they did that was right or wrong and they will improve it the next time. Technology can contribute to this; e-portfolios definitely help with learner performance. By gathering information, students can see their work in a coherent way and over a long period of time; also feedback from students and teachers can help the student learn and perform better.
3- How can you use technology to make assessment activities less threatening to learners or maybe even a positive experience?
A positive way is to use e-portfolios and make them with a group of students. This way individual students won’t feel anxious and the teacher can formally assess students without necessarily giving them a record grade. Also, portfolios can allow students to reflect on their work because they can see everything they have done over a long period of time. Also, using a rubric that both students and the teacher created together can relieve stress and make assessment a positive experience. The student will know exactly what is asked of him or her and therefore, will feel more at ease.
This chapter provided me with a lot of interesting ideas about interesting use of technology and assessment. I found that most of the activities provided were fun and positive for students. Assessment is usually a hard and painful for both students and teachers. I remember when I was on stage, the teachers were so stressed when the report card time came! Some teachers were organized and they had their grades all put on a computer spreadsheet from the beginning of the year; this relieved some of the stress!
I have already read and heard about e-portfolios; unfortunately, not many teachers use them yet; they are still stuck with the old fashion way of putting the portfolios in a binder. However, they’re a great way to see students’ work over time. It is an excellent way to see progress throughout the year and it’s much less stressful for students because it’s done over time and they don’t perceive it as stressful as an exam. Also, they can assess and give feedback of their own work.
Also, during this semester, when Ghada, and I designed our webquest, we used an online rubric generator. I never knew this tool existed. I was so impressed to see how simple it is to make a rubric. I think that designing a rubric with students is a great and positive experience for them because they will know exactly what the teacher expects from them. Also, they will want to perform because they put the rules down!
Clicker technology is interesting! I never knew this tool existed! I especially like it because it’s unanimous. It gives the teacher the overall impression of the students’ understanding without pinpointing who gets it and who doesn’t, beside the whole class. The teacher can automatically address the misconceptions and make sure that students understand. If the teacher still feels like one or two students don’t get it, then she can later go to their desk and give them a one on one explanation.
According to Hoffenberg & Handler, there are no more limitations to videotaping and video editing in the schools. Digital video and editing is a great way to motivate and produce higher level thinking. All you need is a computer and camera; most schools have this available to them (p.246). It’s true that making our own videos can be very motivating. Ghada and I were very excited to make a commercial and edit our final project during class today. We wanted to try and mimic commercials we see on television; but ad our own special touch. So if we were motivated, I can just imagine how much kids would enjoy this. Also, it’s interesting to see the different ways of using this type of technology. Students can become reporters; they can make documentaries, and infomercials. A project such as collecting monarch eggs was transformed into a computer based project. With a little of imagination and preparation, teachers can make great use of this technology (p.247). Nowadays, Teachers need to not only teach students how to read, write, and communicate, but they need to show them how to communicate with audiences that will be watching behind the television or computer (p.249). Also, video is being taken to a whole other level; education colleges are videotaping exemplary teachers in order to show future teachers good models of education (248). It’s another angle of the use of technology; I think that showing these in universities is great because Instead of only reading what goes on in textbooks, we will be exposed to what really goes on in the classrooms.
Technology is a great tool for students with learning disabilities; it can really make a different in their learning experience and learning outcomes. Examples of such programs are speech outcome, word predication, and speech recognition (p.252). These programs may help students who have difficulty writing what is on their mind get their thoughts out. This way, teachers will be able to see and recognize these students’ imagination and creativity; something they wouldn’t be able to do without these tools. Also, a group of tool from textHELP will help struggling readers and writers; these instruments feature talking toolbar, on screen text reading, a phonetic spelling checker, word predication, and thesaurus (p.254). It’s great to see that nothing is impossible anymore. My 12 year old brother has dyslexia and he has never been diagnosed until a month ago! He has always been perceived as a child who can’t write or properly read. It’s great to see that there is some help out there; he will be able to go through school because of the technology and he will hopefully be able to lead a regular adult life.
Assessing Meaningful Learning with Technology
Textbook Questions
1- Is assessment really a separate activity from learning? What circumstances may impact whether it is or isn’t?
Assessment isn’t separate from learning because authentic type of assessment provides information required to improve performance. Students’ skills are assessed with activities that allows them perform those tasks; they are learning while being assessed. Contrarily to older types of assessment where students are assessed on answers they provide; authentic assessment would ask science students to construct something rather than answering questions. The assessment will be on the final product of this construction, instead of being on something separate than what they are working on.
2- How do you see assessment activities as a way to generate feedback that can improve learner performance? After reading this chapter, are there ways you can see how technology can contribute to this?
Because authentic assessment is based on activities that students need to perform in the future, feedback will be necessary. The students will be assessed on the product of this given activity; the feedback given will improve the students’ learning performance on future tasks. The example given in the textbook about social studies students polling the public is a perfect example; they will need to poll people in their future; by being assessed on this task, their learning performance will improve and they will know what they did that was right or wrong and they will improve it the next time. Technology can contribute to this; e-portfolios definitely help with learner performance. By gathering information, students can see their work in a coherent way and over a long period of time; also feedback from students and teachers can help the student learn and perform better.
3- How can you use technology to make assessment activities less threatening to learners or maybe even a positive experience?
A positive way is to use e-portfolios and make them with a group of students. This way individual students won’t feel anxious and the teacher can formally assess students without necessarily giving them a record grade. Also, portfolios can allow students to reflect on their work because they can see everything they have done over a long period of time. Also, using a rubric that both students and the teacher created together can relieve stress and make assessment a positive experience. The student will know exactly what is asked of him or her and therefore, will feel more at ease.
This chapter provided me with a lot of interesting ideas about interesting use of technology and assessment. I found that most of the activities provided were fun and positive for students. Assessment is usually a hard and painful for both students and teachers. I remember when I was on stage, the teachers were so stressed when the report card time came! Some teachers were organized and they had their grades all put on a computer spreadsheet from the beginning of the year; this relieved some of the stress!
I have already read and heard about e-portfolios; unfortunately, not many teachers use them yet; they are still stuck with the old fashion way of putting the portfolios in a binder. However, they’re a great way to see students’ work over time. It is an excellent way to see progress throughout the year and it’s much less stressful for students because it’s done over time and they don’t perceive it as stressful as an exam. Also, they can assess and give feedback of their own work.
Also, during this semester, when Ghada, and I designed our webquest, we used an online rubric generator. I never knew this tool existed. I was so impressed to see how simple it is to make a rubric. I think that designing a rubric with students is a great and positive experience for them because they will know exactly what the teacher expects from them. Also, they will want to perform because they put the rules down!
Clicker technology is interesting! I never knew this tool existed! I especially like it because it’s unanimous. It gives the teacher the overall impression of the students’ understanding without pinpointing who gets it and who doesn’t, beside the whole class. The teacher can automatically address the misconceptions and make sure that students understand. If the teacher still feels like one or two students don’t get it, then she can later go to their desk and give them a one on one explanation.
According to Hoffenberg & Handler, there are no more limitations to videotaping and video editing in the schools. Digital video and editing is a great way to motivate and produce higher level thinking. All you need is a computer and camera; most schools have this available to them (p.246). It’s true that making our own videos can be very motivating. Ghada and I were very excited to make a commercial and edit our final project during class today. We wanted to try and mimic commercials we see on television; but ad our own special touch. So if we were motivated, I can just imagine how much kids would enjoy this. Also, it’s interesting to see the different ways of using this type of technology. Students can become reporters; they can make documentaries, and infomercials. A project such as collecting monarch eggs was transformed into a computer based project. With a little of imagination and preparation, teachers can make great use of this technology (p.247). Nowadays, Teachers need to not only teach students how to read, write, and communicate, but they need to show them how to communicate with audiences that will be watching behind the television or computer (p.249). Also, video is being taken to a whole other level; education colleges are videotaping exemplary teachers in order to show future teachers good models of education (248). It’s another angle of the use of technology; I think that showing these in universities is great because Instead of only reading what goes on in textbooks, we will be exposed to what really goes on in the classrooms.
Technology is a great tool for students with learning disabilities; it can really make a different in their learning experience and learning outcomes. Examples of such programs are speech outcome, word predication, and speech recognition (p.252). These programs may help students who have difficulty writing what is on their mind get their thoughts out. This way, teachers will be able to see and recognize these students’ imagination and creativity; something they wouldn’t be able to do without these tools. Also, a group of tool from textHELP will help struggling readers and writers; these instruments feature talking toolbar, on screen text reading, a phonetic spelling checker, word predication, and thesaurus (p.254). It’s great to see that nothing is impossible anymore. My 12 year old brother has dyslexia and he has never been diagnosed until a month ago! He has always been perceived as a child who can’t write or properly read. It’s great to see that there is some help out there; he will be able to go through school because of the technology and he will hopefully be able to lead a regular adult life.
March 26th
Course pack reading p.235
According to Barrett, when planning to use a computer based portfolio, the teacher must take many factors into consideration. First, the teacher must determine the possible stakeholders that will be involved and look at the portfolio; these being: the teacher, student, parent, administrator, community members, the school district, or the board (p.242). Each person, school and board will have different goals for the use of the portfolio. For example, the school district might want to use it to assess the program, or to document progress achieving standards, whereas high school students might want to use their portfolios as exhibitions, or to demonstrate their academic achievement for college applications (p.237).
In comparison to the “old fashion” way of portfolio making (notebooks, folders, pizza boxes) which can’t be easily stored and necessarily available for a long period of time, the electronic based portfolios will make work portable, accessible, and more easily and widely distributed. All you need is an electronic tool such as a memory stick, or CD to demonstrate all the kids’ great work (p.236). However, the teacher must make sure that the work remains secure and confidential; because after all this is a mean of assessing students’ work (p.239).
Studies on computer based portfolios are still in progress; this is still a new idea and that’s why there aren’t many softwares that are available for portfolio making; the only two are Learner Profile and Graby profile. However, only Graby is able to store portfolio items (p.239).
During this class we went around the building trying to figure out what to create as a video assignment! We finally decided to videotape ourselves in the washroom so we can teach the right use of the toilet and the proper ways of washing our hands. We encountered several glitches; first the camera started turning off for no reason so we taught that there were no more batteries so we went to the media center and rented some batteries. Then it started working a bit so we were able to film a little more; we got most of what we wanted on camera and then it turned off again! Now we didn’t know what the problem was. We asked some help from the guys at the media center and they didn’t know how to work it either. Technology always comes with a risk! We never know when we might encounter a glitch that may slow our work done; or even worse not let us finish what we initially wanted to do. We weren’t able to fix what we wanted to fix but at least we were able to take the memory stick and plug it into the computer so we can get our video. I had never used a device to record myself and transfer it onto a computer; not everyone is familiar with these kinds of technological advancements. Some are still focused to the idea of videotaping to see on TV and they are still afraid of transferring the information onto their computers; if I can do it, anyone can (p.240)!
When we started working with movie maker, we couldn’t get the program to cut where we wanted it to cut. When we selected a specific place, it would cut at the wrong time. We tried different ways and it still didn’t work! Our video wasn’t perfect and it wasn’t the way we really wanted it to come out. But if we had a little more time we would have probably figured it out. When technology doesn’t work and you think you’re doing it right, it can get really frustrating!!! However, what’s nice about using movies is that it’s the best way to use role playing, and student presentation performances; we enjoyed seeing ourselves and I’m sure children would like to see themselves as well (p.240)
Course pack reading p.235
According to Barrett, when planning to use a computer based portfolio, the teacher must take many factors into consideration. First, the teacher must determine the possible stakeholders that will be involved and look at the portfolio; these being: the teacher, student, parent, administrator, community members, the school district, or the board (p.242). Each person, school and board will have different goals for the use of the portfolio. For example, the school district might want to use it to assess the program, or to document progress achieving standards, whereas high school students might want to use their portfolios as exhibitions, or to demonstrate their academic achievement for college applications (p.237).
In comparison to the “old fashion” way of portfolio making (notebooks, folders, pizza boxes) which can’t be easily stored and necessarily available for a long period of time, the electronic based portfolios will make work portable, accessible, and more easily and widely distributed. All you need is an electronic tool such as a memory stick, or CD to demonstrate all the kids’ great work (p.236). However, the teacher must make sure that the work remains secure and confidential; because after all this is a mean of assessing students’ work (p.239).
Studies on computer based portfolios are still in progress; this is still a new idea and that’s why there aren’t many softwares that are available for portfolio making; the only two are Learner Profile and Graby profile. However, only Graby is able to store portfolio items (p.239).
During this class we went around the building trying to figure out what to create as a video assignment! We finally decided to videotape ourselves in the washroom so we can teach the right use of the toilet and the proper ways of washing our hands. We encountered several glitches; first the camera started turning off for no reason so we taught that there were no more batteries so we went to the media center and rented some batteries. Then it started working a bit so we were able to film a little more; we got most of what we wanted on camera and then it turned off again! Now we didn’t know what the problem was. We asked some help from the guys at the media center and they didn’t know how to work it either. Technology always comes with a risk! We never know when we might encounter a glitch that may slow our work done; or even worse not let us finish what we initially wanted to do. We weren’t able to fix what we wanted to fix but at least we were able to take the memory stick and plug it into the computer so we can get our video. I had never used a device to record myself and transfer it onto a computer; not everyone is familiar with these kinds of technological advancements. Some are still focused to the idea of videotaping to see on TV and they are still afraid of transferring the information onto their computers; if I can do it, anyone can (p.240)!
When we started working with movie maker, we couldn’t get the program to cut where we wanted it to cut. When we selected a specific place, it would cut at the wrong time. We tried different ways and it still didn’t work! Our video wasn’t perfect and it wasn’t the way we really wanted it to come out. But if we had a little more time we would have probably figured it out. When technology doesn’t work and you think you’re doing it right, it can get really frustrating!!! However, what’s nice about using movies is that it’s the best way to use role playing, and student presentation performances; we enjoyed seeing ourselves and I’m sure children would like to see themselves as well (p.240)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)